Apple slammed by Judge for flouting court order in Epic Games battle

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has ruled that Apple willfully violated a court injunction from Epic Games’ 2020 lawsuit, which aimed to increase competition in the App Store.

Apple app store for business
Apple app store for business

As a result, Apple has been found in civil contempt and is now barred from restricting third-party payment systems. The judge also referred the case to federal prosecutors for a possible criminal contempt investigation. Apple disputes the ruling and plans to appeal, Reuters news report said.

Apple App Store has generated $24.6 billion in revenues from global users during the second quarter of 2024, more than double the revenues Android users generated via the Google Play Store, according to media reports.

The Backstory: Epic vs. Apple

The dispute began in 2020 when Epic Games sued Apple, challenging the tech giant’s rigid control over app distribution and its infamous 30 percent commission on in-app purchases. In 2021, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an injunction requiring Apple to allow developers to steer users toward alternative payment options —essentially breaking Apple’s stranglehold on transaction revenue.

Apple introduced a new 27 percent fee for external transactions, barely different from the original commission, and deployed “scare screens” to dissuade users from opting for third-party payments. They were moves to preserve Apple’s multibillion-dollar revenue stream in clear violation of the court’s directive.

A Judge’s Rebuke — and a Possible Criminal Probe

Judge Gonzalez Rogers did not mince words. She held Apple in civil contempt and went a step further, referring the case to federal prosecutors for a potential criminal contempt investigation — a rare and serious escalation. The judge accused Apple of “insubordination” and stated unequivocally that internal records showed Apple knew exactly what it was doing.

To make matters worse, a senior Apple executive allegedly lied under oath, and the judge criticized Apple’s lawyers for failing to correct false testimony.

The Cost of Defiance

Apple’s refusal to comply has consequences. Beyond the possible criminal charges, it now owes Epic Games a substantial amount in legal fees — possibly tens of millions of dollars.

At the same time, Apple continues to pursue its own legal claims, seeking to recover over $73 million in fees from Epic — despite the court’s findings that Apple was the one out of line.

Baburajan Kizhakedath

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest

More like this
Related

Africa Smartphone Market Grows 3% in Q1 2026 as Premium Shift Challenges Affordable Segment

According to the latest research from Omdia, smartphone shipments...

Xiaomi boosts Smartphone, AIoT and AI ecosystem with record ASP and 1.1 bn connected devices

Xiaomi reported revenue of RMB99.1 billion for the first...

Europe Smartphone Market Grows 2% in Q1 2026 as Samsung and Apple Lead Premium Shift

Europe’s smartphone market excluding Russia recorded resilient growth during...

Motorola Enters India’s Top 5 Smartphone Brands as Market Share Reaches 8.9% in Q1 2026

Motorola has strengthened its position in India’s highly competitive...