Your guide to usage-based billing in telecom

In the not-so-distant future, telecom providers will bill customers based on how much they use services. Today, it’s almost impossible to discern a customer’s actual usage without help from an outside party. But that could change in the near future. Because of the growing tendency towards use-based billing, some telcos have started introducing this type of billing as a way to make their services more valuable and justify their continued investment in them. Let’s take a look at usage-based billing in telecom, what it entails and why it may be coming to your company soon.
Philippines smartphone usersWhat is Usage-Based Billing in Telecom?

Usage-based billing, also known as UBB, is a billing model where providers charge customers for the amount of data used, as opposed to the amount of money spent. In other words, it’s a way to charge customers for the amount of data they actually use, not the amount they “spend”. With usage-based billing, telecom providers do not charge customers based on the amount of money they transfer. Instead, they look at how much data a customer uses. If a customer is only able to use a certain amount of data before the monthly billing cycle ends, then the telecom provider will not charge this customer any additional fee.

How Does Usage-Based Billing Work in Telecom?

If you’re a telecom provider, then you’re probably curious as to how your customers are receiving their usage-based billing charges. With usage-based billing, the telecom provider is looking at the amount of data your customers are using. It’s the same principle as with a credit card transaction: The provider is calculating the difference between the amount of data used and the amount of money paid. If your telecom provider is billing you based on actual data used, then it’s using a technology known as “carrier billing.” The way it works is similar to Netflix’s model. Customers pay for a monthly subscription, and the subscription entitles them to a certain amount of data. This data is set by the telecom provider after conducting an analysis of the customer’s usage. While many companies like to use the term “bill,” this is often incorrect, as the term “bill” is most often used in reference to the amount of money that the customer “spends” on the telecom service. But usage-based billing refers to the amount of data used.

How do telecom providers use Usage-Based Billing?

Again, the way usage-based billing works is similar to a credit card transaction. When a customer subscribes to your telecom service, the provider records the amount of data used by this customer. This information is then sent to the telecom provider’s usage-based billing software system, which then calculates the difference between the amount of data used and the money paid. After that, the bill is sent to the customer’s address. This process is done every month, so you must be sure that your billing information is accurate. But what happens if a customer goes over their monthly data allotment? The telecom provider will send that customer an email message reminding them that they have overused their data allotment by a certain amount.

Is Usage-Based Billing in Telecom Right for You?

Usage-based billing is meant to give the customer the best possible service. Therefore, it’s important to remember that you, as the telecom provider, are always right. As the customer, you may be charged for data that was not used, or you may receive notifications regarding overzealous use. While you can choose to opt out of this system, it is a system that probably makes sense to you. Therefore, it’s important to remember that usage-based billing is meant to give the customer the best possible service.

Why is it so difficult to track usage in telecom?

The main issue with using actual data to bill customers is that it’s difficult to track actual data usage. In fact, many studies have shown that nearly half of all mobile data consumed is not even being recorded. This is because most mobile devices do not send accurate data usage information back to their telecom providers. This means that many customers will continue to be charged for data that was not even used, or the telecom provider may receive inaccurate data usage information.

Defining a baseline for usage-based billing

In order to provide customers with a better service, some telecom providers have started defining a baseline for usage-based billing. If a customer’s actual data traffic doesn’t meet the baseline, then the customer will be charged extra fees for using data. Depending on the telecom provider, defining a baseline for usage-based billing may be done by a third-party partner. For example, AT&T may use Ookla’s Speedtest to determine a baseline for usage-based billing. If a customer uses less than the baseline, the customer will not be charged any fee. If a customer uses more than the baseline, the customer will be charged an overage fee.

Conclusion

If you need to keep an eye on usage and know when to charge customers, then usage-based billing is the way to go. It’s also a good idea to keep an eye out for billing changes, like usage-based billing. In order to make this change easier, some telecom providers are implementing usage-based billing. The biggest question you should ask yourself is whether you should implement usage-based billing. To get a more accurate answer, you’ll need to take a step back and ask yourself the following question: Do I want to know how much customers use my services, or do I want to continue charging customers based on the amount of money they “spend”?

Latest

More like this
Related

Huawei gains share in RAN market: Dell’Oro

The RAN market declined for the sixth consecutive quarter...

Nokia buys Rapid’s technology assets in API push

Nokia has acquired Rapid’s technology assets, including its extensive...

Huawei unveils strategies for talent development in the age of industrial intelligence

As the world evolves into a fully digital era...

Telecom and tech policy after Donald Trump’s 2024 election win

Strand Consult has released a research note on Donald...