Australia has become the first country to block social media access for children under 16, enforcing a sweeping new law that places strict obligations on ten of the world’s largest digital platforms, including TikTok, YouTube, Instagram and Facebook.
Credit Freepik
The law took effect from midnight on December 10, 2025, Wednesday, requiring digital platforms to prevent under-16 users from accessing their social media services or risk fines of up to A$49.5 million. Companies must demonstrate that they have robust age verification and enforcement mechanisms in place.
As of 21 November 2025, eSafety report said it considers Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, Twitch, X, YouTube, Kick and Reddit to be age-restricted platforms, with the list expected to be updated before the rules take effect.
A platform becomes age restricted if it meets three conditions: it is designed mainly for online social interaction, it lets users link or interact with others, and it allows users to post content.
Some services, such as online gaming platforms and standalone messaging apps, are excluded. However, messaging services with social media style features or messaging accessed through an age restricted account may still fall under the rules.
The Australian government said the measure is aimed at reducing online harm, bullying, inappropriate content exposure and mental health risks among young users. Officials framed the decision as a necessary response to rising concerns about the impact of social platforms on children.
Technology companies pushed back, arguing that the rules are difficult to implement and may unintentionally drive children to unregulated or less safe online spaces. Industry groups also warned that mandatory age verification could create privacy risks, including new forms of data collection and identity checks.
Civil liberties and digital rights organisations echoed concerns about overreach and potential surveillance. They cautioned that the law could compromise the privacy of both children and adults if platforms adopt intrusive age verification technologies.
On the other hand, parents’ associations and child safety advocates welcomed the ban. Many said the move provides long-awaited protection from addictive features, harmful content and online peer pressure.
Experts interviewed in major global publications questioned the practicality of enforcement. They pointed out that existing age estimation tools are prone to errors, which could block legitimate adult users or fail to detect underage users.
The decision has triggered worldwide attention, with commentators noting that other governments may consider similar restrictions. Policymakers in Europe and North America are already evaluating new rules around children’s access to social media.
Several platforms are reportedly assessing legal options and lobbying for modifications to the new framework. Some companies have suggested alternative approaches such as improved parental controls and expanded safety tools rather than outright bans.
While, Australia’s move marks one of the most aggressive regulatory steps taken against social media platforms, opening a new chapter in global debates over online safety, privacy and platform accountability, there is no indication on the financial impact on digital platforms.
Baburajan Kizhakedath
