EU Court Adviser Calls for Review of Apple’s $14 bn Tax Ruling

In a development, an adviser to the European Union’s top court has recommended a review of the 2016 ruling in favor of Apple over a 13-billion-euro ($14 billion) tax order. The adviser, Giovanni Pitruzzella, argued that the EU tribunal had made legal errors and failed to assess certain methodological errors related to Apple’s Irish tax rulings, Reuters news report said.
Apple Mac salesThe tax case against Apple was initiated as part of the EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager’s efforts to crack down on what regulators considered unfair state aid in deals between multinationals and EU countries. The European Commission, in its 2016 decision, claimed that Apple had benefited from Irish tax rulings for over two decades, artificially reducing its tax burden to as low as 0.005 percent in 2014.

The European Union’s General Court had upheld Apple’s challenge in 2020, stating that regulators had not met the legal standard to demonstrate that Apple had enjoyed an unfair advantage. However, Pitruzzella disagreed, emphasizing that the General Court had committed legal errors and failed to assess the substance and consequences of certain methodological errors.

While the CJEU is expected to rule in the coming months, around four in five such recommendations are typically followed. Ireland reiterated its position, stating that it had not provided any state aid to Apple and emphasizing that the opinion of Pitruzzella is non-binding.

Despite Apple and Dublin appealing against the tax order, Apple had already paid the full amount, which Ireland held in an escrow account. The Irish government has prepared for potential claims from other EU member states for a share of the back taxes, even if it retains the money.

In response to the adviser’s opinion, an Apple spokesperson expressed gratitude for the court’s consideration, reiterating the General Court’s ruling that Apple received no selective advantage and no state aid.

Margrethe Vestager, known for her tax crackdown, has had a mixed record in court defending her tax cases, with recent wins against Stellantis, Amazon, and Starbucks.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Latest

More like this
Related

Motorola Moto Pad 70 Groove Takes on Samsung, OnePlus, Xiaomi and Apple with ₹33,999 Premium AI Tablet

Motorola has intensified competition in India’s premium Android tablet...

Apple Q3 2026 Revenue Jumps 16% to $109.4 bn as iPhone, Mac, Services and China Drive Growth

Apple reported a strong fiscal third quarter for 2026,...

Smartphone Shipments Drop 6% to 272 mn in Q2 2026 as Samsung Leads with 22% Share and Xiaomi Falls 26%

Global smartphone shipments fell 6 percent to 272 million...

Apple Set for Record 2026 Market Share: iPhone Hits 25%, iPad 39%, Mac 12% as Mac Shipments Jump 23%

Apple is expected to achieve record market share across...